A common complaint made by employers is that the amount of time it takes to meet their FBT obligations is disproportionate to the amount of tax it actually generates. This frustration is arguably borne out in the number of mistakes that are often made when calculating the amount of FBT payable. A good example is employers taking the view that an employee’s home is a place of work and therefore FBT does not apply to the use of a company car to drive to and from work.
Inland Revenue has been working on a new interpretation statement that provides guidance on the treatment of home to work travel. It covers topics such as whether taking a vehicle home for charging or security reasons is sufficient to conclude that FBT does not apply. For the purpose of these two examples, the conclusion is that FBT would still apply, which hopefully does not come as a surprise.
The guidance is expected to be finalised shortly. Current treatment should be confirmed based on the guidance once released. However, in line with the original complaint, the draft statement is over 50 pages long and is likely to only reinforce the conclusion that maybe Inland Revenue’s resources should have been put into how to simplify the regime instead.
